Legal Opinion
Blackwell v. Sectek, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 5, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1536PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Eugene B. Blackwell, proceeding pro se, brings this action against his employer, SecTek, Inc. (“SecTek”). Blackwell alleges employment discrimination and a hostile work environment in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1976 (“ADEA”). SecTek has moved to dismiss Blackwell’s complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, SecTek’s motion will be granted and Blackwell’s complaint will…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Vick v. DonahoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Cooper v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.