Calcutt v. . McGeachy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
"While on this appeal the question of jurisdiction of the court under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, C. S., 628 (a) et seq., is not presented by the parties, it is proper to state that the action is maintainable only in so far as the legislative act, ch. 196, Public Laws 1937, affects the civil “rights, status and other relations” in the present actual controversy between parties. We consider it only in that aspect.
The court below has found as a fact, without objection, that the first eleven types of slot machines and devices described in the complaint are within the letter of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Durham v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Person v. . DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Town of Shelby v. Cleveland Mill & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- City of Greensboro v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Taos County Board of Education v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. PerdueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.