Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1971No. 39PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

The first problem presented by this appeal is whether the question which petitioner raises is justiciable under the Post Conviction Act. The answer is No. The Act authorizes any prisoner serving a sentence in the State Prison System to institute a proceeding in the Superior Court of the county of his conviction to challenge the validity of his incarceration upon the following grounds: (1) that in the proceeding which resulted in his conviction there was a substantial denial of his rights under the Constitution of the United States or of the State of North Carolina; (2) that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Banks v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Great American Insurance Company v. GoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Simeon v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API