City of Greensboro v. Wall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act, G.S. 1-253 et seq., may be invoked “only in a case in which there is an actual or real existing controversy between parties having adverse interests in the matter in dispute.” Lide v. Mears, 231 N.C. 111, 56 S.E. 2d 404, and cases cited. It must appear that “a real controversy, arising out of their opposing contentions as to their respective legal rights and liabilities under a deed, will or contract in writing, or under a statute, municipal ordinance, contract or franchise, exists between or among the parties, . . .” Light Co. v. Iseley, 203…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Town of Tryon v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Bolick v. American Barmag Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.