Buhman v. Nickels & Brown Bros.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
Unlawful detainer. The complaint contains allegations showing that the executors of the last will of Charles Robinson, deceased, leased certain real property of the estate in Napa County to the defendant corporation, and that the defendant went into possession under said lease. That the lease contained the following covenant: “It is further mutually understood and agreed by the parties hereto, that in case of a sale of the demised premises that the said second party will quit and surrender the said premises upon 30 days’ written notice, and the said first parties will pay to the said second…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoyt v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Harloe v. LambieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Jack v. SinsheimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- San Francisco Law & Collection Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Earl Orchard Co. v. FavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hignell v. GebalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Devonshire v. LangstaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ryland v. AppelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Flynn v. FlynnMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- Percival v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906