Earl Orchard Co. v. Fava
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Unlawful detainer. The cause was tried by the court, without a jury, and plaintiffs had judgment from which and from the order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals. The court made the following findings: That defendant’s lease of the premises in question was made in October, 1898, to commence on December 1, 1898, and end on November 30, 1899; that it was renewed for a second and third year, terminating each year on November 30th, the third year terminating November 30, 1901; that on December 7, 1901, plaintiffs made demand of defendant in writing for possession of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Kuhn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Perine v. TeagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bauer v. NeuzilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Igauye v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Bettens v. HooverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Buhman v. Nickels & Brown Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.