Legal Opinion
Devonshire v. Langstaff
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1935No. Civ. 5455PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
In 1927 plaintiffs and appellants herein, who will hereafter be known as lessors, entered into a lease with respondents whom we will hereafter refer to as lessees.
As a part of the arrangement in the lease lessees also entered into a declaration of trust wherein they pledged with First Trust and Savings Bank of Pasadena certain stock as security for the performance of the obligations of the lease.
Unpaid rentals accrued under the lease on April 1 and on May 1, 1933. Lessees also failed to pay certain taxes provided for in the lease,, which had become delinquent December 5, 1932.
The important…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. Pennsylvania R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1903
- Watkins v. Dorothy A. McCartneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Buhman v. Nickels & Brown Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1905
- Wisner v. RichardsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fifth & Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Tauber v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Folberg v. Clara G. R. Kinney Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Hignell v. GebalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Reserve Oil & Gas Co. v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.