Jones v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is a condemnation proceeding, instituted by plaintiff, Nettie E. Jones, against defendants, Nora E. Wallace, W. R. Ramsey, and the city of Oklahoma City, to assess damages resulting from the appropriation by the city of certain real property for public use under its power of eminent domain. Nora E. .Wallace and W. R. Ramsey by answer and cross-petition each claimed to be the owner of the property and sought like relief. Upon trial judgment was rendered for the defendant city, and plaintiff, Nettie E. Jones, and defendants Nora E. Wallace and W. R. Ramsey separately appeal.
The facts in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Pure Oil Co. v. Miller-McFarland Drilling Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
- McKay v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Magness v. KerrOregon Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Town of Chouteau v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Fuhr v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- United States v. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Oklahoma City v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Corbyn v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.