Legal Opinion

McKay v. City of Enid

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1910No. 486PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by A. S. McKay against the City of Enid and others. Judgment of dismissal, and plaintiff brings error. Citing: 28 Cyc. 1354-5; Zanesville v. Fannan, 53 Oliio St. 605; Fort Scott v. Pede (Kan. App.) 49 Pac.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Garfield County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by A. S. McKay against the City of Enid and others. Judgment of dismissal, and plaintiff brings error. Citing: 28 Cyc. 1354-5; Zanesville v. Fannan, 53 Oliio St. 605; Fort Scott v. Pede (Kan. App.) 49 Pac. Ill; Lewis, Eminent Domain, secs. 56, 227. Citing: Frith v. Oily of Dubuque, 45 Iowa, 406; City of Denver v. Bayer (Colo.) 2 Pac. 6; Sore-nsen v. Town of Greely (Colo.) 15 Pac. 803; Stackhouse v. Oity of Lafayette, 26 Ind. 17; Ratcliff e v. Mayor, 4 N. Y. 195; Barney v. Keokuk, 94 U. S. 324; Pa. R. Go-, v. Miller, 132…

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

Plaintiff in error is the owner of the S. E. % of section 1, township 22 N, range 7 W., which lies northwest and outside of the limits of the city of Enid. Immediately southeast of his property, and separated from it by the intersections of two public highways, is an addition of the city of Enid, known as “Kenwood Addition.” From the intersection of the highway running east and west along the south side of plaintiff’s property with the highway running north and south along the east side at the southeast corner of his property, there are three streets running into the city of Enid: One running…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  4. State v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  5. Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. N.C. Corff Partnership, Ltd. v. OXY USA, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Blanding v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Mitchener v. City Com'rs, City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Terminal Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API