Legal Opinion
Kathy Philpott v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 1983No. 82-3550PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Philpott appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the A.H. Robins Company (Robins), manufacturer of the Daikon Shield intrauterine device (Daikon Shield). The district court held that Philpott’s action, based upon injuries allegedly caused by a Daikon Shield, was barred by Oregon’s products liability statute of limitations. We affirm.
PACTS
In August, 1971, Philpott was fitted with a Daikon Shield. On May 30,1972, she was diagnosed as having Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, with a swollen abscess to her right fallopian tube and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,000 Ora E. Gaines v. D. J. Haughton, Lois A. And James Fitzpatrick v. D. J. HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- M. D. Rutledge v. Boston Woven Hose and Rubber Company, a Division of American Biltrite, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Lewis v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Edmund J. Harm v. Bay Area Pipe Trades Pension Plan Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Linda Miller and Barry Miller v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Jack Ray Allen and Sandy Lynn Allen, Husband and Wife v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- State of Alaska v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.