Legal Opinion

Huff v. Great Western Seed Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1996No. CC 930061; CA A80301; SC S41976PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

We are asked in this case to decide when the statute of limitations begins to run in a particular class of unlawful employment practice actions brought pursuant to ORS 659.121(1). Those actions, designated as “unlawful motive” cases in the employment law field, are cases in which the employer is charged with engaging in a practice that, except for the fact that it is prompted by an unlawful motive, would be lawful. The Court of Appeals concluded that, in such cases, the applicable statute of limitations, ORS 659.121(3), 1 does not begin to run until the plaintiff “ha[s] the requisite…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dotson v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Williams v. Waterway Terminals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cortez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Kraxberger v. Chevron USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Shasta View Irrigation District v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rice v. RabbOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Waxman v. Waxman & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API