Legal Opinion

Ballou v. Sunflower Gold Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1913No. Sac. No. 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County and from an order refusing a new trial. George L. Jones, Judg-p. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $1,825, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The prayer of plaintiff’s complaint was for the enforcement of an alleged miner’s lien on certain property alleged to belong to the defendants, and for a personal judgment against defendants for any deficiency remaining due on plaintiff’s claim after sale of property. The claim was for $14,545, being for 2909 days’ labor at five dollars per day, performed between November 30, 1901, and October 23, 1909. The statute of limitations was not…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Sidney v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Layton v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Beggs v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Hardy v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API