Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Frey

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1920No. Civ. No. 3340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment went against plaintiff, from which he appeals upon the judgment-roll alone.

It appears from the findings that on October 9, 1914, defendant Elizabeth C. Frey acquired by purchase a lot, title to which prior to said date had been vested in the Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank. In anticipation of the purchase and while negotiations therefor were pending, she, on September 17, 1914, entered into a contract with plaintiff whereby he undertook and agreed to erect a dwelling-house upon the lot for her. In pursuance of the contract he, on October 5,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ballou v. Sunflower Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Freman v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Engebritsen v. Latin-American Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Hammond Lumber Co. v. RoubianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API