Legal Opinion

Humphries v. Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Justice, /./at August Term, 1913, of Euthereoed. Action for malicious prosecution. Defendant bad prosecuted tbe plaintiff before a magistrate for an assault upon him, under tbe following circumstances: Plaintiff was son-in-law of one Dycus, tbe latter having formerly rented land from defendant, and so ploughed it that tbe furrows obliterated tbe boundary line between tbe lands wbicb adjoined.

Read the full summary

Appeal by plaintiff from Justice, /./at August Term, 1913, of Euthereoed. Action for malicious prosecution. Defendant bad prosecuted tbe plaintiff before a magistrate for an assault upon him, under tbe following circumstances: Plaintiff was son-in-law of one Dycus, tbe latter having formerly rented land from defendant, and so ploughed it that tbe furrows obliterated tbe boundary line between tbe lands wbicb adjoined. Defendant went witb one Johnson to mark or stake off tbe line again, and broke some slats of a fence to use for stakes. While they were engaged.in “sighting” tbe line, Dycus…

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, J.,

after stating the case: The first question is, whether’ there was any evidence that defendant prosecuted the plaintiff for the assault without probable cause, for in an action of this kind it is necessary to allege and prove malice, a want of probable cause, and the termination of the former suit or proceedings. R. R. v. Hardware Co., 138 N. C., 174.

Malice may be inferred from the absence of probable cause, or may be otherwise established. Johnson v. Chambers, 32 N. C., 287; Kelly v. Traction Co., 132 N. C., 369; Merrell v. Dudley, 139 N. C., 57. And then there is general malice…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Jackson v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Wilkinson v. . WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. State v. . RawlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Carson v. DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Dickerson v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API