Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. . Refining Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Civil action for malicious prosecution.
It appears from the record that on Saturday morning, 8 February, 1930, the plaintiff, who is president and general manager of the King Cotton Garage, Inc., ordered from the Atlantic Refining Company, Inc., 100 gallons of gasoline to be delivered during the day. The order was given to and received by E. R. Swaim, manager in charge of the Greensboro office of the Atlantic Refining Company, Inc., and delivery was made about 5 p.m. that afternoon by F. G. Brady, truck-driver and deliveryman for the said Refining Company.
In payment of the gasoline the…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Denver & Rio Grande Railway v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Daniel v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Pitts v. Village Inn Pizza, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Cook v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.