Wilkinson v. . Wilkinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Ooolte, J., at January Term, 1912, of DURHAM. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Walker.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution. The defendant had caused the arrest and prosecution of the plaintiff, who was not related to him, upon the charge of haying feloniously stolen certain admission tickets belonging to him as proprietor of the Arcade Theater in Durham. The criminal proceedings were brought before the recorder, and when the solicitor stated that he had not been able to examine the ease, and the defendant insisted upon an immediate trial, a nol. pros., with leave, was entered at the suggestion of the recorder, in order to preserve the rights of the State, but the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Morgan v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Marcus v. Bernstein, Cohen & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Gillespie v. SplahnIndiana Superior Court · 1872
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pitts v. Village Inn Pizza, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. HickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Carson v. DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.