Legal Opinion

Stacey v. Emery

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 11, 1878No. 52PublishedCited by 204 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Emery, a supervisor of internal revenue, was sued by Stacey for causing the seizure of a quantity of whiskey belonging to him, which had been libelled by the collector of internal revenue, under Emery’s direction, and subsequently released, on dismissing the proceedings against it.

That judgment and the accompanying order are in the words following: “ It is, therefore, considered by the court that the information in this cause be dismissed, and that the delivery bond given by the claimant for the property seized in this cause be discharged. It is further ordered by the court that the cost be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Apollon.Supreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. Talbot v. SeemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  4. United States v. RiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  5. Sixty Pipes of BrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1825

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API