Credit Clearance Bureau v. George A. Hochbann Contracting Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
The facts of this case are simple, and the questions of law are not difficult of solution. George A. Hochbann Contracting Company had a general contract for the construction of a certain building in San Francisco. This company entered into a sub-contract in writing with G. W. Burke, the assignor of the plaintiff, under the terms of which Burke was to do the plastering work on the building. The points in the case involve the questions: 1. Whether or not the work on the sub contract was done under…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by11 opinions
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Dugan v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Producers Fruit Co. v. GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Hart v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.