Hart v. Frost
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kay Cottnty; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Thomas Albert Hart against Ethel Frost and B. W. Frost. Judgment for defendants, and p aintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DAVIS,. C.
On the 21st day of
October, 1914, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, entered into a written contract with de-dendants in error, defendants below, by the terms of which plaintiff purchased from defendants the northeast quarter of section 32, and the east half of the southeast quarter of section 29, township 29 north, range 5 east of the Indian meridian, Kay county. Okla., for the sum of $4,500. By the terms of said contract plaintiff assumed the payment or a mortgage then on said premises for the sum of $2,200; $100 was paid on the day that said contract was' entered into;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Bowman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Success Realty Co. v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Evans v. McKannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rusch v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Ex Parte ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- City of Muskogee v. BurfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Barnett v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.