Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Cantara & Sons

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 15, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

Employees Raymond L. Nichols and Richard L. Mooers, in this consolidated appeal raise the issues of whether, pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 68 (1989), the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in failing to allocate a portion of a third-party settlement to the employee’s spouse’s loss of consortium claim when the parties to the settlement made no express allocation. They also question whether the Board properly handled the employer’s lien under section 68 with respect to a third-party settlement relating to one work related injury when the workers’ compensation benefits paid or payable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  3. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Ibbitson v. Sheridan Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. McKellar v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hunley v. Silver Furniture Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wawenock, LLC v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  3. Zoss v. Dakota Truck UnderwritersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Town of Orono v. LaPointeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  5. Fernald v. Dexter Shoe Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API