Legal Opinion

McKellar v. Clark Equipment Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 23, 1984PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

The two cases included in this consolidated Report to the Law Court pose the following questions. Is a wife’s claim against her husband’s employer and co-employee for loss of consortium resulting from a work-related injury to her husband, barred by the immunity and exclusivity provisions of the Maine Workers’ Compensation Act, or alternatively, is it barred because it is derivative in nature? The Superior Court and the parties in each action have invoked this Court’s authority pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 72(b). 1 We conclude that the issues “are of sufficient importance and doubt”…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Drake v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Gagne v. Carl Bauer Schraubenfabrick, GmbHDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1984
  3. In Re ALL MAINE ASBESTOS LITIGATION (PNS CASES). Petition of UNITED STATES of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Li v. C.N. Brown Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Derosia v. Book Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API