St. Clair v. Hatch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDREAU, Justice.
¶ 1 We assume original jurisdiction over these discovery disputes to decide an issue of first impression: What factors must the trial court consider when determining whether to order a party to undergo a medical examination which the party to be examined deems unsafe?
I. FACTS
¶ 2 Plaintiffs sued Dr. Jorge A. Saborio (Dr. Saborio) and Durant H.M.A., Inc. d/b/a Medical Center of Southeastern OHahoma (Medical Center) for medical malpractice arising out of laser ablation surgery performed on plaintiff, David Ray St. Clair, Sr. (St.Clair), by Dr. Saborio on July 21, 1994, during a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- State ex rel. Letts v. ZakaibWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Ex Parte Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Stasiak v. Illinois Valley Community HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CREST INFINITI, II, LP v. SwintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Holmes v. NightingaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Boswell v. SchultzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Boswell v. SchultzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Holmes v. NightingaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.