Boswell v. Schultz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
175 P.3d 390 (2007)
2007 OK 94
Cody Harrison BOSWELL and, Cheryl Boswell, Petitioners,
v.
Kandee SCHULTZ, Respondent, and
Vicki L. Robertson, Judge of the District Court, real party in interest.
No. 104,840.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
December 4, 2007.
Howard Israel, Oklahoma City, OK, for Petitioners.
KAUGER, J.
¶ 1 The issue presented is whether a party to a lawsuit who is required to undergo a medical examination pursuant to 12 O.S.2001 § 3235[1] may videotape his or her examination. We hold that he or she may. Therefore, we assume original jurisdiction and grant the writ of prohibition and writ of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- City of Kingfisher v. AltizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Special Indemnity Fund v. BedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.