Legal Opinion

Stasiak v. Illinois Valley Community Hospital

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 7, 1992No. 3—91—0211PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gorman

Plaintiff was ordered by the trial court to submit to a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test pursuant to defendant’s Supreme Court Rule 215 (134 Ill. 2d R. 215) motion. Conflicting medical affidavits were submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion. The safety of the plaintiff undergoing an MRI necessarily under sedation in this case is disputed by the medical experts.

Plaintiff’s attorney and plaintiff’s father (and next friend) refused to submit the plaintiff to the MRI. Based on their failure to comply with the trial court’s order, they were found in contempt of court and fined…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. In Re Conservatorship of StevensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Thomas v. John T. Mather Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Langelier v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Letts v. ZakaibWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Harris v. Mercy HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. St. Clair v. HatchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. STATE EX REL. LETTS BY LETTS v. ZakaibWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Pena v. TroupDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API