Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Stucky

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1926No. 16413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

Only one proposition is presented and argued in this case and this is covered by the first assignment of error reading:

“That said court erroneously sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence.”

That the tax levies involved in this action are not illegal levies is disclosed by the following allegation of plaintiff’s original petition :

“That defendant wrongfully and without authority of law and over plaintiff’s objection and exception has extended the tax levies legally applicable to property located within the city of Tulsa upon the assessment of said premises.”

That it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Temple v. Achenbach, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Sowers v. First Nat. Bank of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Cotton v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Parkinson v. ValenteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Huston v. Curtis Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API