Legal Opinion

Jasper v. Lumpee

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1970No. 387PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Judge.

This is a suit for personal injuries. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant entered pursuant to a jury verdict. We affirm.

Assumption of risk was an issue in the case, and the jury was instructed thereon, without objection, in the form prescribed by New Mexico Uniform Jury Instructions, ■Civil (U.J.I. 13.10), as follows:

“11. The defendant contends the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury from the dangers which the plaintiff contends caused his injury. If you find each of the following propositions the plaintiff ■cannot recover:
“1. That a dangerous situation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Zamora v. SmalleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lanier v. Securities Acceptance CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Demarest v. T. C. Bateson Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Williamson v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Rice v. GideonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Rice v. GideonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API