Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Securities Acceptance Corporation

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1965No. 7011PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMANUS, District Judge.

George B. Hisel and Maryland Casualty Company sought damages against Clark Lanier on account of an auto-truck collision in which Lanier’s 17-year-old son had been the driver of the auto. Lanier then filed a third-party action against Securities Acceptance Corporation (hereinafter termed S.A.C.) and Central Insurance Company, seeking reimbursement from them in any amount for which he might be found to be liable to Hisel and Maryland Casualty Company. His claim against the third-party defendants is based upon an alleged agreement to procure an automobile liability…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kutz Canon Oil & Gas Co. v. HarrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Mills v. Southwest Builders, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Adams v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lujan v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Sanchez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Aboud v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. YurcicNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API