Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rice v. Gideon

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1974No. 1173Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

A. Last clear chance instruction was properly given

The trial court gave U.J.I. 12.12 on last clear chance. Defendant objected on the following grounds:(a) no evidence or testimony to support the instruction; (b) no evidence plaintiff could not escape by use of ordinary care; (c) no showing that defendant had knowledge of plaintiff’s peril; (d) no showing defendant had a clear chance to avoid the injury; and (e) it is not a proper statement of the law.

The majority hold that since plaintiff did not plead or try the issue of last clear chance, it was error to give the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mantz v. FollingstadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Thayer v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Casey v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API