Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Smith

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1971No. 9243PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPHENSON, Justice.

The plaintiff, Williamson, a journeyman plumber, sought damages against E. J. Smith, a master plumber, and J. R. Trenching and Excavating Company (J. R.), for injuries which he received from a cave-in while he was laying pipe in the bottom of a trench.

The particular work was part of a construction project of Warren Properties, who had hired Smith to do the plumbing work. Smith, in turn, had hired plaintiff through an arrangement with a local union. J. R. had cut the trench.

Williamson, in his complaint, alleged that his injuries were caused by the negligence of both…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Tuttle v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Blackburn v. DortaSupreme Court of Florida · 1977

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API