Legal Opinion

Lilly v. Todd

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 26, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

15 N.J. Super. 1 (1951)

83 A.2d 21

LAURENA LILLY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

GUERIN TODD, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued July 16, 1951.

Decided July 26, 1951.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, LLOYD and STANTON.

Mr. Edmund J. Canzona argued the cause for the petitioner-respondent (Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona & Combs, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for the respondent-appellant (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

This is a workmen's compensation case. Both the deputy director of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Russo v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Temple v. Storch Trucking Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Vandenberg v. John De Kuyper SonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Galloway v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Link v. Eastern Aircraft, Linden Division, General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trusky v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Joy v. Florence Pipe Foundry Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Van Note v. CombsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Walsh v. KotlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Arrington v. GoldsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API