Legal Opinion

Arrington v. Goldstein

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 17, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

23 N.J. Super. 103 (1952)

92 A.2d 630

LEOLA ARRINGTON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

BENJAMIN GOLDSTEIN, M.D., AND ANOTHER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 20, 1952.

Decided November 17, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.

Mr. Stanley Cohen argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Frankel and Frankel, attorneys; Mr. Abraham Frankel, of counsel).

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Edward E. Kuebler, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The sole question is whether the accident…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cossari v. L. Stein Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  2. Mixon v. KalmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  3. Lilly v. ToddNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Morgan v. LetwenskeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pigford Bros. Construction Co. v. EvansMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Fenton v. Margate Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. Daly v. Edwards Engineering Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Runk v. Rickenbacher Transportation Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API