Legal Opinion
Trusky v. Ford Motor Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 30, 1952PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
19 N.J. Super. 100 (1952)
88 A.2d 235
MARGARET TRUSKY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, LINCOLN-MERCURY DIVISION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 21, 1952.
Decided April 30, 1952.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.
Mr. Verling. C. Enteman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys).
Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weiner & Weiner, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.
One James Trusky died on January 14, 1949. His widow and sole dependent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gilbert v. Gilbert Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Russo v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Folsom v. Magna Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Vandenberg v. John De Kuyper SonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Mountain Hill, LLC v. Tp. of MiddletownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.