Legal Opinion
Van Note v. Combs
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 19, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 N.J. Super. 529 (1953)
95 A.2d 12
SAMUEL VAN NOTE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
CLARENCE COMBS AND HARRY COMBS, T/A COMBS RIDING ACADEMY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 9, 1953.
Decided February 19, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.
Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas F. Shebell argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.
Upon considering the testimony of the petitioner and of the other witnesses who personally appeared before…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zabriskie v. Erie R. R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Trusky v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Kulinka v. Flockhart Foundry Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Zabriskie v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crotty v. Driver Harris Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Buerkle v. United Parcel ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Olivera v. Hatco Chemical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- O'REILLY v. Roberto Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.