Legal Opinion
Joy v. Florence Pipe Foundry Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 14, 1960PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
64 N.J. Super. 13 (1960)
165 A.2d 191
NATHANIEL P. JOY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
FLORENCE PIPE FOUNDRY CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 24, 1960.
Decided November 14, 1960.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).
Miss Ruth Rabstein argued the cause for petitioner-respondent (Messrs. Pellettieri & Rabstein, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.
Nathaniel P. Joy filed a petition in the Division of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Claim of Masse v. James H. Robinson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Jones v. California Packing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
- Dudley v. Victor Lynn Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lindquist v. City of Jersey City Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Williams v. Western Electric Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Lightner v. CohnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Mein v. Meade CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.