Heisey v. Port of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This action was instituted by J. S. Heisey, as a taxpayer of Pierce county, under the declaratory judgment act (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), §§ 784-1 to 784-17 [P. C. §§ 8108-21 to 8108-37], Laws of 1935, chapter 113, p. 305, as amended by Laws of 1937, chapter 14, p. 39), against port of Tacoma, a municipal corporation (which will hereinafter be referred to as the district), and the commissioners thereof, county of Pierce, and its commissioners, to obtain a judgment declaring chapter 45, Laws of 1939, p. 130, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 9709-1 [P. C. §4475-11] et seq. (port districts act),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Washington Beauty College, Inc. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Oregon Creamery Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- EACRET ET UX v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Hogue v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Danforth v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Moran v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.