Washington Beauty College, Inc. v. Huse
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This action was instituted under Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), §§ 784-1 to 784-17 [P. C. §§8108-21 to 8108-37] (chapter 113, Laws of 1935, p. 305, as amended by chapter 14, Laws of 1937, p. 39), the declaratory judgment act, to secure a judgment passing upon the validity of § 3 (a) of chapter '215, Laws of 1937, p. 1043 (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 8278-3(a) [P. C. § 427-53 (a) ]). From a judgment entered holding this statutory provision constitutional, the Washington Beauty College, Inc., alone appeals.
Chapter 215, supra, reflects an attempt to regulate the practices of hairdressing and beauty…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Yakima Amusement Co. v. Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Revis v. Daugherty, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- To-Ro Trade Shows v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- To-Ro Trade Shows v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.