Legal Opinion
Acme Finance Co. v. Huse
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1937No. 26723. En BancPublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
This action was instituted by the Acme Finance Company on May 7, 1937, under the uniform declaratory judgment act of the state of Washington, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), §§ 784-1 to 784-16 [P. C. §§ 8108-21 to 8108-35] (Laws 1935, p. 305), inclusive, for the purpose of testing the constitutionality of chapter 213, Laws of 1937, p. 1034, the title to which is as follows:
“An Act relating to small loans; providing for the licensing and regulating the business of making loans under three hundred dollars ($300.00); prescribing a maximum rate of interest; providing for the regulation of the business of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- To-Ro Trade Shows v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.