Mueller v. Gallina
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
GADOLA, District Judge.
This is a “Bivens action” in which Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 396-97, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). “In Bivens, despite the absence of a Congressional statute authorizing a federal cause of action, the Supreme Court held that damages may be recovered from federal agents for injuries inflicted by them in violation of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mayer v. MylodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Stewart, Sonya v. Evans, Donald L.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Joseph v. KimpleDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2004
- In Re CMS Energy Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005