Groh v. Ramirez
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
Petitioner conducted a search of respondents’ home pursuant to a warrant that failed to describe the “persons or things to be seized.” U. S. Const., Amdt. 4. The questions presented are (1) whether the search violated the Fourth Amendment, and (2) if so, whether petitioner nevertheless is entitled to qualified immunity, given that a Magistrate Judge (Magistrate), relying on an affidavit that particularly described the items in question, found probable cause to conduct the search.
*554I
Respondents, Joseph Ramirez and members of his family, live on a large ranch in Butte-Silver Bow County, Montana.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,187 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Messerschmidt v. MillenderSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
1,182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.