Legal Opinion

In Re CMS Energy Securities Litigation

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 7, 2005No. 02 72004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CMS ENERGY CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STEEH, District Judge.

Before the court in this securities litigation is defendant CMS Energy’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). 1 Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings argues for dismissal of plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) on the basis of insufficient pleading of transaction and loss causation. For the reasons stated below and discussed at the hearing before this court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities LitigationsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. In Re Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  3. Ong Ex Rel. Ong v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API