Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Mordecai

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1951No. 456PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbyiN, J.

The plaintiffs make these assertions by their assignments of error :

1. That the judge did not observe the provisions of G.S. 1-185, specifying that “upon the trial of an issue of fact by the court, its decision shall be given in writing, and shall contain a statement of the facts found, and the conclusions of law separately.”

2. That the judge committed prejudicial error in admitting certain testimony tendered by the defendants.

These objections will be considered in their numerical order.

The contention of the plaintiffs that the judge did not comply with G.S. 1-185 is epitomized in their brief…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Estate of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Bloss v. RahillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API