Legal Opinion

Knobbe v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Where there is credible evidence that respondent sustained an injury to his right leg sufficiently severe so as to be followed by serious consequences rendering him incapable of working, is still causing him to suffer pain, and the prognosis is a likelihood of a resulting amputation of the leg at the ankle or knee or possibly at the hip joint, the Industrial Commission is warranted in holding that the healing period, as that term is used in the statutes, has not passed even though the evidence is opposed by very strong testimony that the condition is at present fixed and that the permanent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Winter v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gerue v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. McDonald v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mednicoff v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Salmon v. Denhart ElevatorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. California Packing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. ITW Deltar v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API