Legal Opinion
Kirsch v. Smith
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 19, 1994No. 94-C-474PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiffs, Kevin Kirsch and James Griffin, currently incarcerated at the Waupun Correctional Institution [“W.C.I.”], have filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the above-captioned defendants. Their complaint is accompanied by “Plaintiff Kirsch’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,” “Plaintiff Griffin’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,” and a motion for a “Temporary Restraining Order or in the Alternative a Preliminary Injunction” [“TRO motion”]. The plaintiffs’ motions requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Casteel v. PieschekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- William Lee Howland v. William Kilquist and Gene TruittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vester Russell v. City of Milwaukee, City of Milwaukee Employees' Retirement System Annuity & Pension Board, Gary J. BrazgelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Kirsch v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- Russell, Vester v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- West v. McCaughtryDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997