Legal Opinion
Kirsch v. Smith
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 14, 1995No. 94-C-474PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
In a May 19, 1994, decision and order, I granted the plaintiffs’ request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Kirsch v. Smith, 853 F.Supp. 301 (E.D.Wis.1994). The defendants were directed to answer the plaintiffs’ complaint and to respond to the plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction. I denied the plaintiffs’ request for temporary relief in a decision and order dated December 5, 1994. Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
On…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kirsch v. EndicottCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Alvarado v. IthierDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
- Babcock v. Town of Sugar CreekDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
- Holloway v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
- Kirsch v. EndicottCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996