Legal Opinion
Casteel v. Pieschek
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 23, 1993No. Nos. 91-1227, 92-1378PublishedCited by 331 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
The Casteel and Ingram, appeals were consolidated to consider two questions regarding county jail inmates’ constitutional right of access to courts: the extent to which the requirements set out in Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977) for prison authorities must also be met by county jail officials, and the applicability of the prejudice requirement under DeMallory v. Cullen, 855 F.2d 442 (7th Cir.1988). Both cases involve individual capacity claims against public officials,1 however, and therefore we must first resolve the qualified immunity…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by331 opinions
- Richard Leo Deorle v. Greg Rutherford, Butte County Deputy Sheriff Mick Grey, Butte County Sheriff County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- William K. Zimmerman v. Margarita Tribble, Craig Hanks and Edward L. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Tate v. SCR Medical TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Ronald Mendoza v. Sherman Block, Los Angeles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Harris v. RoderickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
326 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.