Legal Opinion

State v. Chilton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of illegal possession of narcotics and was given a sentence not to exceed two years’ imprisonment. The sole assignment of error is that the sentence constituted excessive, cruel and unusual punishment.

The thrust of defendant’s argument is that he, a college student with no previous- criminal record, should have been placed on probation or given a more lenient sentence by the trial judge for this nonviolent offense. He also urges that the trial judge was unduly influenced by information volunteered by defendant to the presentence investigator and included…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. ShannonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. WalleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  5. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. HecketCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. FraleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. HouckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API