Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 1, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury on two counts: Burglary not in a dwelling (ORS 164.240) and larceny of property of a value not in excess of $75 (ORS 164.310 (1) (b)). He was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment on the burglary conviction and to six months on the larceny conviction, such sentences to run consecutively.

On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) by refusing to grant his motion to dismiss the burglary charge on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence of intent; (2) by discriminating against defendant in the sentencing procedure because he was a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hebb v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. State v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. Zavala-RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API