Legal Opinion
State v. Scott
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1964PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The defendant was tried and convicted under the following indictment:'
“HOLLIS D. SCOTT, also known as TED SCOTT is accused by the Grand Jury of Washington County by this indictment of the crime of ob taining money by false pretenses committed as follows.
“That the said defendant Hollis D. Scott, also known as Ted Scott, on the 17th day of September A.D. 1962, in the said County of Washington, State of Oregon, then and there being did then and there unlawfully and feloniously, with intent to injure and defraud, falsely pretend to Myrtle Elliott that he, the said Hollis D. Scott, also known as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gumm v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. GilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- STATE Ex Rel MEDFORD PEAR CO. v. FOWLEROregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Sevener v. Northwest Tractor & Equipment Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Commonwealth v. LeBlancMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Russell v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. SpeedisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.