Legal Opinion

State v. Hecket

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

The defendant was convicted in a trial by jury of assault and robbery being armed with a dangerous weapon and assault with a dangerous weapon. The guilty verdict on each count was by a ten to two vote. He was given concurrent sentences of life imprisonment and 10 years and from this judgment he appeals.

His first assignment is that a unanimous verdict is required in a criminal-case. This contention is without merit. State v. Gann, 254 Or 549, 463 P2d 570 (1969).

Second, defendant claims the court erred in ordering Corrections in the.'transcript of defendant’s trial. Defendant filed his notice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fry v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Beelman v. BeelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State Ex Rel. United Railways Co. v. EkwallOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. HumphreyOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RonnigerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. WertheimerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API