Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Taft v. Advance United Expressways

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1991No. C9-90-2153PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

In this case we agree with the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals that it does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over a contribution/reimbursement claim by a compensation insurer against the Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association.

Petitioner-relator National Union Fire Insurance Company (accompanied by its insured employer Advance United Expressways) filed a petition for reimbursement or contribution with the Workers’ Compensation Division, naming Excalibur Insurance Company and the Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association as respondents. Excalibur had gone through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Freeman v. Armour Food Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bantz v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Maxwell Communications v. Webb Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Ast v. Har Ned LumberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Gerads v. Bernick's Pepsi-ColaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API